The situational theory of leadership suggests that no single leadership style is best. Instead, it is dependent on which sort of strategies and direction are best-suited into the job and the situation at hand. According to the theory, the many successful leaders are the ones that can adapt their style to the situation and look at cues like the kind of task, the character of the group, along with other factors which may contribute to getting the work done.

Leadership theory is referred to as the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, following its developers, Dr Paul Hersey, author of”The Situational Leader,” and Kenneth Blanchard, author of”One-Minute Manager.”

Hersey and Blanchard’s Leadership Styles

Blanchard and Hersey suggested that there are four leadership styles:

• Notification (S1): within this leadership style, the chief tells people what to do and how to do it.
• Selling (S2): This style involves more back-and-forth between followers and leaders. Leaders”sell” their ideas and message for group members to purchase into the procedure.
• Participating (S3): In this approach, the chief offers less management and enables members of the team to have a more active role in creating ideas and making decisions.
• Delegating (S4): This style is characterized by a less involved, hands-off approach to leadership. Take the majority of the responsibility for what occurs and group members often make the majority of the decisions.

Maturity Levels

The style of leadership depends on the maturity level (i.e., the degree of knowledge and competence) of the people or group.

Hersey and Blanchard’s theory identifies four levels of maturity

• M1: Group members lack the knowledge, abilities, and willingness to complete the job.
• M2: Group members are enthusiastic and willing, but lack the ability.
• M3: Group members have the skills and capacity to complete the job, but are reluctant to take responsibility.
• M4: Group members are highly skilled and eager to complete the job.

Matching Leadership Styles With Maturity Levels

The model suggests the following leadership styles are the most suitable for these maturity levels:

• Low Maturity (M1)–Notification (S1)
• Medium Maturity (M2)–Selling (S2)
• Medium Maturity (M3)–Participating (S3)
• High Maturity (M4)–Delegating (S4)

A Flexible Leadership Model

A more”telling” style may be necessary at the beginning of a job When followers lack knowledge or the duty to work by themselves. As subordinates become knowledgeable and more experienced the leader might want to change to an approach. That leader can adapt according to the needs of the followers and the requirements of the circumstance, this model of leadership focuses on flexibility.

The approach to leadership avoids the pitfalls of By recognizing that there are distinct ways of handling a problem and that leaders will need to have the ability to evaluate a situation and the maturity levels of subordinates to ascertain what approach the approach is the best in any given moment.

Situational theories, Therefore, consider the complexity of dynamic circumstances and the people.

The SLII Model

The Situational Leadership II (or SLII version ) was developed by Kenneth Blanchard and builds on Hersey concept and Blanchard. According to this version of this concept, leaders must base their behaviour. The level is determined by the level of dedication and competence of each individual. These amounts include:

• Enthusiastic Beginner (D1): High devotion, low competence.
• Disillusioned Learner (D2): Some proficiency, but setbacks have contributed to low commitment.
• Capable But Cautious Performer (D3): Competence is growing, but the level of commitment varies.
• Self-Reliant Achiever (D4): High competence and dedication.

SLII Leadership Styles

SLII suggests that leadership is dependent on two key Behaviors: directing and Update. Directing behaviours include trying to control the behaviour of group members and giving instructions and instructions. Behaviours that are supporting include actions like listening encouraging subordinates and offering feedback and recognition.

The concept describes four basic leadership styles

• Directing (S1): High on directing behaviours, low on encouraging behaviours.
• Coaching (S2): High on both directing and encouraging behaviours.
• Supporting (S3): Low on directing behaviour and high on encouraging behaviours.
• Delegating (S4): Low on both directing and encouraging behaviours.

SLII theory’s point is none of these four Leadership styles is greatest. Rather, their behaviour will be matched by a successful leader to the ability of every subordinate for the job.

Important Situational Factors

Experts indicate that there are four key variables that Leaders must know about when creating an assessment of the circumstance. These variables include:

• Advisors will need to take into account the relationship between the leaders and the members of this team.
• Social and aspects can play a part. By way of instance, a team that lacks performance and productivity may benefit from a style that rules highlights order, and clearly defined roles. A productive group of highly skilled employees, on the other hand, might benefit from a more democratic fashion which enables group members to operate independently and have entered in organizational decisions.
• The leader should think about the task itself. The leader should have a good idea of just what the task entails to ascertain if it’s been successful and accomplished, although tasks may range from simple to complicated.
• The degree of authority that the leader has over group members must also be considered. Some leaders have power conferred itself. Other leaders gain power through their relationships with workers, frequently by gaining respect from them, offering support to them, and helping them feel included in the decision-making procedure.
• As the Hersey-Blanchard version indicates, leaders will need to think about the degree of maturity of each group member. The maturity level is a measure of a person’s ability in addition to her or his willingness to complete the job. Assigning a member who’s willing but lacks the ability a project is a recipe for failure.

Being able to pinpoint every employee’s level of maturity allows the Leader to pick the leadership strategy that is best to help employees accomplish their targets.